1. By the Numbers...

2. The Narrative

3. Academic Research Archives

4. Dissertations/Peer? Reviewed Articles (is this different from #3? -MichaelHerman)

5. Places we meet on line: Should we list?

         1. Are they worth adding?

               1. Michael Herman's posting

               2. Diane Gibeault's posting

         2. http://mail.google.com/mail/#search/wikipedia./124fe4c9a305494b

   6. Wikipedia alert checklist

         1. Citations or missing footnotes

         2. Instructions, advice, how-to-content: not allowed

         3. Proponents? A weasel word?!!

         4. Citation needed; last paragraph above philosophy

   7. Harrison : "Academic literature has virtually ignored Open Space"

         1. The truly interesting thing is that the academic literature (along with academia) has virtually ignored Open Space. To the best of my knowledge there has never been a peer reviewed article published anywhere. There have been several dissertations, but that is all. Question: How could the academic world ignore a 25 year old, 100,000 iteration, 136 country phenomenon? Go figure!

         2. In fact there have been major stories in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Times of London, etc,etc.  -- which perhaps could be used if somebody cared to do so. A search of the archives of the Times and the Post will produce those articles. Should we search and include these?

   8. Wikipedia Nudge and Open Space

         1. Beginning of something bigger?

         2. Is it time to craft a story in one document our way, not the Wikipedia one, in one place?

         3. Brian's email : “Telling and documenting (not academia like) of turning the traditional way of doing things on its head"