[Home]BoardNotesJuly2004

OpenSpaceWorldNET | RecentChanges | Preferences | Search | HELP | Contribute! | OpenSpaceWorldORG

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 6c6,8
1. It was agreed that future minutes would note actions agreed by members during the monthly virtual board meetings, which would inform members who missed the meeting and could be matters arising for future BIN items.
1. It was agreed that future minutes would note actions agreed by members during the monthly
virtual board meetings, which would inform members who missed the meeting and could be matters
arising for future BIN items.

Changed: 8c10,11
2. It was also agreed that minute taking would rotate among members at each meeting. KN agreed to take the first minutes under this new arrangement.
2. It was also agreed that minute taking would rotate among members at each meeting. KN agreed
to take the first minutes under this new arrangement.

Changed: 22c25,27
1. OSonOS in USA will be held on November 7 & 8, 2004 at the Carlton Hotel in Oak Park, just outside Chicago for practitioners and interested people with a sliding fee from $50 to $150 and any excess over direct costs to go into a pot to fund projects from the event, etc.
1. OSonOS in USA will be held on November 7 & 8, 2004 at the Carlton Hotel in Oak Park, just outside
Chicago for practitioners and interested people with a sliding fee from $50 to $150 and any excess
over direct costs to go into a pot to fund projects from the event, etc.

Changed: 26c31,32
2. Prosper Ndabishuriye requested $2,500 to fully fund an event in Bujumbura on August 14 & 15, 2004 for 100 participants.
2. Prosper Ndabishuriye requested $2,500 to fully fund an event in Bujumbura on August 14 & 15, 2004
for 100 participants.

Changed: 30,34c36,49
1. PH & JE would draft a response from the Board that kept open discussions for future support, but explained how OSI US worked (our funding criteria) and our need to hear more about Prosper's future plans and impact of an event to expand OST training and/or lead to further events.

2. The proposal underscored the need to look at criteria for funding events, by addressing such questions as should the Board fund events? Would it start a precedent? Do we need special criteria. such as knowledge of the facilitator(s) track record? For example, while some Board members had met and were impressed by Prosper at the PoP? event, nobody could confirm Mike Seymour's credibility as a facilitator. Also, JE raised the sensitivities of events in the Third World, noting that more harm than good could be done.

3. KN raised the need to discuss a balance between the Board's priorities for a programme it initiated and responding to external requests. For example, if funded, LH noted that Prosper's proposal would absorb one third of the Board's cash resources.
1. PH & JE would draft a response from the Board that kept open discussions for future support, but
explained how OSI US worked (our funding criteria) and our need to hear more about Prosper's future
plans and impact of an event to expand OST training and/or lead to further events.

2. The proposal underscored the need to look at criteria for funding events, by addressing such
questions as should the Board fund events? Would it start a precedent? Do we need special criteria.
such as knowledge of the facilitator(s) track record? For example, while some Board members had
met and were impressed by Prosper at the PoP? event, nobody could confirm Mike Seymour's credibility
as a facilitator. Also, JE raised the sensitivities of events in the Third World, noting that more harm
than good could be done.

3. KN raised the need to discuss a balance between the Board's priorities for a programme it initiated
and responding to external requests. For example, if funded, LH noted that Prosper's proposal would
absorb one third of the Board's cash resources.

Changed: 44,46c59,66
5.2 Leveraged efforts that reach multiple people, especially in training or other sustainings sort of way. (KN asks if worth clarifying by adding "raising awareness, promoting understanding of and making new applications for OST?")
5.3 Situations wherein other groups or individuals have already made investments so that OSI-USA can augment rather than initiate projects (KN asks does this matching funds concept need clarification as to percentages and recognition of in-kind contributions?)
5.4 Project sponsors and facilitators who will do good work and bring the story back to the larger OS community (are sponsor and facilitator credibility a new criteria for funding?)
5.2 Leveraged efforts that reach multiple people, especially in training or other sustainings sort
of way. (KN asks if worth clarifying by adding "raising awareness, promoting understanding of
and making new applications for OST?")
5.3 Situations wherein other groups or individuals have already made investments so that OSI-USA
can augment rather than initiate projects (KN asks does this matching funds concept need
clarification as to percentages and recognition of in-kind contributions?)
5.4 Project sponsors and facilitators who will do good work and bring the story back to the larger
OS community (are sponsor and facilitator credibility a new criteria for funding?)

Changed: 48c68,69
7. How to handle OSI US income earned from provision of fiduciary responsibilities (see 4.22.04 proceedings: items B,C & D raised by PH)
7. How to handle OSI US income earned from provision of fiduciary responsibilities
(see 4.22.04 proceedings: items B,C & D raised by PH)

PRESENT: All Board members participated at various times.

PRELIMINARY ACTIONS:

1. It was agreed that future minutes would note actions agreed by members during the monthly 
virtual board meetings, which would inform members who missed the meeting and could be matters 
arising for future BIN items.

2. It was also agreed that minute taking would rotate among members at each meeting.  KN agreed 
to take the first minutes under this new arrangement.


REVISED BIN (agreed at start of meeting):

The following BIN items were agreed to be discussed in order of priority:

1. OSonOS in USA
2. Request from Bujumbura (Burundi)
3. Update OSonOS in Goa
4. Further discussion of Space Corps

MEETING ACTIONS:

1. OSonOS in USA will be held on November 7 & 8, 2004 at the Carlton Hotel in Oak Park, just outside 
Chicago for practitioners and interested people with a sliding fee from $50 to $150 and any excess 
over direct costs to go into a pot to fund projects from the event, etc.

ACTION: DG will post the invitation on the OSLIST.  PH will provide the OSI US mailing list of 400 names.

2. Prosper Ndabishuriye requested $2,500 to fully fund an event in Bujumbura on August 14 & 15, 2004 
for 100 participants.

ACTIONS: After considerable discussion, the following actions were taken:

1. PH & JE would draft a response from the Board that kept open discussions for future support, but 
explained how OSI US worked (our funding criteria) and our need to hear more about Prosper's future 
plans and impact of an event to expand OST training and/or lead to further events.

2. The proposal underscored the need to look at criteria for funding events, by addressing such 
questions as should the Board fund events? Would it start a precedent?  Do we need special criteria. 
such as knowledge of the facilitator(s) track record?  For example, while some Board members had 
met and were impressed by Prosper at the PoP event, nobody could confirm Mike Seymour's credibility 
as a facilitator. Also, JE raised the sensitivities of events in the Third World, noting that more harm 
than good could be done.

3. KN raised the need to discuss a balance between the Board's priorities for a programme it initiated 
and responding to external requests.  For example, if funded, LH noted that Prosper's proposal would 
absorb one third of the Board's cash resources.

CARRYOVER BIN ITEMS:

1. Update OSonOS in Goa
2. Further discussion of Space Corps
3. Consider whether to fund future events and if additional criteria needed.
4. Sale of OST principles poster in 15 languages from OSonOS event at Fyn, Denmark (ACTION: PH would get estimated costs).
5. Review and apply funding criteria posted by MH on OpenSpaceWorldNET as follows:
5.1 Projects that serve underserved areas of the world.
5.2 Leveraged efforts that reach multiple people, especially in training or other sustainings sort 
of way. (KN asks if worth clarifying by adding "raising awareness, promoting understanding of 
and making new applications for OST?")
5.3 Situations wherein other groups or individuals have already made investments so that OSI-USA 
can augment rather than initiate projects (KN asks does this matching funds concept need 
clarification as to percentages and recognition of in-kind contributions?)
5.4 Project sponsors and facilitators who will do good work and bring the story back to the larger 
OS community (are sponsor and facilitator credibility a new criteria for funding?)
6. Donating remaining 180 first edition PoP books (PH)
7. How to handle OSI US income earned from provision of fiduciary responsibilities 
(see 4.22.04 proceedings: items B,C & D raised by PH)
8. US OST outreach ideas (DG)
9. CIRCLES OF CHANGE video distribution (JE)
10. Surprise event for HO's 70th birthday on 12.2.05, eg. OSonHO?

NEXT MEETING DATE: 11.00 a.m. PST on Friday, August 27, 2004


OpenSpaceWorldNET | RecentChanges | Preferences | Search | HELP | Contribute! | OpenSpaceWorldORG
This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited July 25, 2004 3:22 pm USA Pacific Time by MichaelHerman (diff)
Search:

OpenSpaceWorld.ORG is funded by contributions, maintained by MichaelHerman, and open to ALL friends and practitioners. If you'd like to add to the read-only pages here, email webmaster@openspaceworld.org and say something about who you are and what you'd like to post. Then we'll tell you how!